DSEX5,924.600.00%

Manipulation Shield

every listed stock scored on 6 public-data signals — a base rate, not an accusation

MARKET AVG SCORE
8 / 100across the whole Universe
RED ZONE (≥60)
2 namesof 26 listed
FLAGGED TURNOVER
4%of today's traded value flows through red-zone names
ESCALATING
2 namesscore risen this month

Featured Investigation

DHAKAFIBRE

Textile · Cat Z · fictional listing · the highest score on the board

97 / 100

HOW THE SCORE BUILDS — SIGNAL BY SIGNAL

  • Negative EPS with price +52% in 30 days — junk-pump profile+35
  • Sponsors reduced 2.4pp last quarter while price rose+25
  • 22% of free float turning over daily — volume concentration+15
  • Upper circuit 4 of last 6 sessions on thin float+15
  • Z-category stock outperforming index — zombie rally pattern+10
  • Price/volume shape 82% similar to a past enforcement case+8

Signals total 108. The score shown is held at 97 by the cap that keeps severe profiles on fictional listings.

CO-MOVEMENT · 20-SESSION RETURN CORRELATION

  • PADMAAGROρ 0.61shield 97 · moving in the same windows

Correlation between two price series, and nothing more. Candidates are limited to listings that already carry a flagged score, so a clean company is never named here.

Watchboard

Every listed stock, most flagged first.

Does the Score Work?

What stocks in each score band did next.

  • 0–29 · CLEAN+5.8%vs market +3.1%

    71% matched or beat the market — a clean score is quietly informative, not merely the absence of bad news.

  • 30–59 · WATCH+0.9%vs market +3.1%

    52% lagged the market — a drag rather than a disaster, but one worth a reason before accepting it.

  • 60+ · RED ZONE−18.4%vs market +3.1%

    78% underperformed, with a median peak-to-trough of −31%.

Simulated over two years of the seeded tape — the score describes the pattern, not the people.

Escalations This Month

Whose risk score rose or fell most this month.

Rising

  • DHAKAFIBRE+67→ 97Negative EPS with price +52% in 30 days — junk-pump profile
  • PADMAAGRO+67→ 97Negative EPS with price +38% in 30 days — junk-pump profile

Cooling

Nothing is cooling — no score fell this month.

Momentum is the only scoring input that moves with time in this build, so a score change is the same profile re-scored against the momentum of a month ago.

Early Warning

Stocks starting to look like the pattern, before they score badly.

No listing scoring 40–59 currently meets two of the three preconditions — a quiet tape on the formation front.

In the simulated study, names meeting two or more preconditions crossed into the red zone within 12 sessions in 58% of cases.

Your Exposure

The risk scores of the stocks you follow.

Add a stock to your Watchlist or record a Holding, and its Shield exposure appears here.

If You Hold a Red-Zone Name

What the numbers suggest checking, step by step.

  1. 1 · Check the position's liquidity first: at 10% of daily volume, how many sessions would it take to exit the whole holding?
  2. 2 · Decide an exit level now, while the decision is calm, rather than during a fall.
  3. 3 · An alert set below the current price is how that decision gets kept.
  4. 4 · Sponsor sell filings have historically preceded the steepest part of the fall — the Event Study Lab shows by how much.

These are observations about what has followed similar patterns, not investment advice.

Case Files

What happened to stocks that scored this badly.

  • Z-category textile · thin float−61% over three months

    The score crossed 80 during a week of repeated upper circuits. Eleven consecutive down sessions followed the peak.

    LESSON ▸ The score reached the red zone 22 sessions before the top — the signal was early rather than late.

  • B-category food processor · sponsors exiting−54% over four months

    The score peaked in the high 70s, and sponsor sell filings landed within two sessions of the high.

    LESSON ▸ The filing marked the turn more precisely than the price did.

  • Z-category agro · no earnings behind the rise−38%, with no recovery inside the window

    The score reached the low 70s at the peak. A year later the price had regained none of the fall.

    LESSON ▸ In these histories a distributed float did not re-rate simply because the price had fallen.

Simulated histories, deliberately unattributed. The pattern is what carries the lesson — no company, real or fictional, is named here.